Pro Safe the Professional Choice Trademark Details
Word Mark | Pro Safe the Professional Choice |
---|---|
Status | Dead 603 — Abandoned - After Ex Parte Appeal |
Serial Number | 86047384 |
---|---|
Status Date | Wednesday, July 6, 2016 |
Filing Date | Wednesday, July 6, 2016 |
Attorney | Michael R. Graif |
Correspondent
MICHAEL R GRAIF
CURTIS MALLET-PREVOST COLT & MOSLE LLP
101 PARK AVENUE 35TH FLOOR
NEW YORK, NY 10178-3499
CURTIS MALLET-PREVOST COLT & MOSLE LLP
101 PARK AVENUE 35TH FLOOR
NEW YORK, NY 10178-3499
Case File Statements
Indication of Colors | The color(s) blue is/are claimed as a feature of the mark. |
---|---|
Description of Mark | The mark consists of a three-dimensional design of a configuration of a battery in blue with the wording "PRO" and "SAFE" separated by two chevron designs and a dash. Each term has three lines underneath with one long line running under both terms. At the bottom of the mark is the wording "THE PROFESSIONAL CHOICE". The colors black, white and gray represent background, outlining, shading and/or transparent areas and are not part of the mark. |
Goods & Services | Batteries |
Classifications
International Class Codes |
009
|
---|---|
U.S. Class Codes | 021, 023, 026, 036, 038 |
Status | 6 — Active |
Status Date | Wednesday, September 4, 2013 |
First Use Anywhere | Tuesday, April 16, 2013 |
First Use In Commerce | Tuesday, April 16, 2013 |
Primary Code | 009 |
Trademark Timeline
-
Apr 16 2013First use anywhere for the mark
-
Apr 16 2013First use in commerce for the mark
-
Aug 26 2013Trademark application filed with USPTO
-
Aug 29 2013New Application Entered In Tram
-
Sep 04 2013New Application Office Supplied Data Entered In Tram
-
Sep 05 2013Notice of Design Search Code E-Mailed
-
Dec 10 2013Assigned To Examiner
-
Dec 20 2013Notification of Non-Final Action E-Mailed
-
Dec 20 2013Non-Final Action E-Mailed
-
Dec 20 2013Non-Final Action Written
-
Feb 26 2014International filing request made
-
Feb 26 2014New Application For Ir Received
-
Feb 28 2014Application For Ir Rejected By Mpu
-
Jul 21 2014Abandonment Notice Mailed - Failure To Respond
-
Jul 21 2014Abandonment - Failure To Respond Or Late Response
-
Sep 22 2014Teas Response To Office Action Received
-
Sep 22 2014Petition To Revive-Granted
-
Sep 22 2014Teas Petition To Revive Received
-
Sep 23 2014Notice of Revival - E-Mailed
-
Sep 24 2014Assigned To Lie
-
Oct 09 2014Teas/email Correspondence Entered
-
Oct 09 2014Correspondence Received In Law Office
-
Nov 25 2014Notification of Non-Final Action E-Mailed
-
Nov 25 2014Non-Final Action E-Mailed
-
Nov 25 2014Non-Final Action Written
-
May 26 2015Correspondence Received In Law Office
-
May 26 2015Teas Response To Office Action Received
-
May 27 2015Teas/email Correspondence Entered
-
Jul 24 2015Notification of Final Refusal Emailed
-
Jul 24 2015Final Refusal E-Mailed
-
Jul 24 2015Final Refusal Written
-
Jan 25 2016Teas Request For Reconsideration Received
-
Jan 26 2016Ex Parte Appeal-Instituted
-
Jan 26 2016Jurisdiction Restored To Examining Attorney
-
Jan 26 2016Exparte Appeal Received At Ttab
-
Feb 01 2016Teas/email Correspondence Entered
-
Feb 01 2016Correspondence Received In Law Office
-
Feb 22 2016Notification of Action Denying Req For Recon E-Mailed
-
Feb 22 2016Action Denying Req For Recon E-Mailed
-
Feb 22 2016Action Continuing Final - Completed
-
May 14 2016Exparte Appeal Dsmsed - Failure To File Brief
-
Jul 06 2016Abandonment - After Ex Parte Appeal
-
Jul 06 2016Exparte Appeal Terminated
-
Jul 12 2016Abandonment Notice Mailed - After Ex Parte Appeal