Aham Certified Rating Certified Clean Air Delivery Rate From Air Cleaner To Air Cleaner, Compare the Cadr Numbers. First, Look At the Suggested Room Size. Then Refer To the Tobacco Smoke, Dust and Pollen Clean Air Delivery Rate (cadr) Numbers. the Higher the Numbers, the Faster the Unit Filters the Air. This Air Cleaner Is Suggested For Use In A Single Closed Room Up To ___ Square Feet. Room Size Ratings Conform To the Aham Certification Program Criteria of 80% Smoke Reduction. Higher Clean Air Delivery Rates Provide Improved Performance In All Room Sizes. Portable Air Cleaners Will Be Much More Effective In Rooms Where All Doors and Windows Are Closed. Tobacco Smoke: ___ Dust:___ Pollen:__ These Values Represent Performance That Can Be Expected Within the First 72 Hours of Operation. Subsequent Performance May Vary with Use. Www.cadr.org Trademark Details
Word Mark | Aham Certified Rating Certified Clean Air Delivery Rate from Air Cleaner to Air Cleaner, Compare the Cadr Numbers. First, Look at the Suggested Room Size. Then Refer to the Tobacco Smoke, Dust and Pollen Clean Air Delivery Rate (Cadr) Numbers. the Hi |
---|---|
Status | Alive Registered 702 — Section 8 & 15-Accepted and Acknowledged |
Current Owner
Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers of Washington, DC
View all trademarks for Association of Home Appliance ManufacturersSerial Number | 76629223 |
---|---|
Registration Number | 3267022 |
Status Date | Saturday, June 29, 2013 |
Filing Date | Saturday, June 29, 2013 |
Registration Date | Tuesday, July 24, 2007 |
Attorney | Susan Neuberger Weller |
Correspondent
Susan Neuberger Weller
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and
SUITE 900
701 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW
WASHINGTON DC 20004-2608
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and
SUITE 900
701 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW
WASHINGTON DC 20004-2608
Case File Statements
Indication of Colors | Color is not claimed as a feature of the mark. |
---|---|
Certificate Mark Statement | The certification mark, as used by authorized persons, certifies that the manufacturer claimed dust, tobacco, and pollen removal ratings of air cleaners for household use are determined and accurately stated in accordance with the American National Standard ANSI/AHAM AC-1. |
Disclaimer with Predetermined Text | "Certified", "Clean Air", "Delivery Rate", "from Air Cleaner to Air Cleaner, Compare the Cadr Numbers. First, Look at the Suggested Room Size. Then Refer to the Tobacco Smoke, Dust, and Pollen Clean Air Delivery Rate (Cadr) Numbers. the Higher the Numbers, the Faster the Unit Filters the Air. This Air Cleaner Is Suggested for Use in a Single Closed Room up to ___ Square Feet. Room Size Ratings Conform to the Aham Certification Program Criteria of 80% Smoke Reduction. Higher Clean Air Delivery Rates Provide Improved Performance in All Room Sizes. Portable Air Cleaners Will Be Much More Effective in Rooms Where All Doors and Windows Are Closed. Tobacco Smoke: ___ Dust:___ Pollen:__ These Values Represent Performance That Can Be Expected Within the First 72 Hours of Operation. Subsequent Performance May Vary with Use," and "Www.Cadr.Org" |
Goods & Services | Air Cleaners for Household Use |
Pseudo Mark | Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers Certified Clean Air Delivery Rate Certified Rating |
Section 2(f) Limitation Statement | as to "ASSOCIATION OF HOME APPLIANCE MANUFACTURERS" |
Classifications
International Class Codes | |
---|---|
U.S. Class Codes | A |
Status | 6 — Active |
Status Date | Wednesday, February 9, 2005 |
First Use Anywhere | Tuesday, January 1, 2002 |
First Use In Commerce | Tuesday, January 1, 2002 |
Primary Code | A |
Trademark Timeline
-
Jan 01 2002First use anywhere for the mark
-
Jan 01 2002First use in commerce for the mark
-
Jan 28 2005Trademark application filed with USPTO
-
Feb 09 2005New Application Entered In Tram
-
Aug 27 2005Assigned To Examiner
-
Oct 06 2005Combined Examiner's Amendment/priority Action Entered
-
Oct 06 2005Examiner's Amendment/priority Action Mailed
-
Oct 06 2005Examiners Amendment And/or Priority Action - Completed
-
Mar 28 2006Correspondence Received In Law Office
-
Mar 28 2006Paper Received
-
Jun 03 2006Amendment From Applicant Entered
-
Jun 22 2006Teas Change of Correspondence Received
-
Jul 05 2006Final Refusal E-Mailed
-
Jul 05 2006Final Refusal Written
-
Dec 11 2006Correspondence Received In Law Office
-
Dec 11 2006Paper Received
-
Jan 12 2007Amendment From Applicant Entered
-
Jan 12 2007Correspondence Received In Law Office
-
Jan 12 2007Amendment From Applicant Entered
-
Jan 12 2007Assigned To Lie
-
Jan 17 2007Ex Parte Appeal-Instituted
-
Jan 29 2007Jurisdiction Restored To Examining Attorney
-
Mar 09 2007Approved For Pub - Principal Register
-
Mar 11 2007Law Office Publication Review Completed
-
Apr 18 2007Notice of Publication
-
May 08 2007Published For Opposition
-
Jul 24 2007Registered-Principal Register
-
Jul 24 2007Trademark officially registered with the USPTO
-
Jun 17 2013Teas Section 8 & 15 Received
-
Jun 29 2013Notice of Acceptance of Sec. 8 & 15 - E-Mailed
-
Jun 29 2013Registered - Sec. 8 (6-Yr) Accepted & Sec. 15 Ack.
-
Jun 29 2013Case Assigned To Post Registration Paralegal
-
Jul 24 2016Courtesy Reminder - Sec. 8 (10-Yr)/sec. 9 E-Mailed